United States v. Saul Lara-Perez

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Saul Lara-Perez

564 F. App'x 59

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 16, 2014

Docket13-40987

StatusUnpublished

This text of 564 F. App'x 59 (United States v. Saul Lara-Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Saul Lara-Perez, 564 F. App'x 59 (5th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Saul Lara-Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 *60 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Lara-Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Saul Lara-Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 *60 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Lara-Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 F. App'x 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-saul-lara-perez-ca5-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack