United States v. Sarvis

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 29, 2010
Docket10-7251
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Sarvis (United States v. Sarvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sarvis, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7251

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRAVIS LEQUINN SARVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-7389

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:06-cr-01241-TLW-1)

Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 29, 2010

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis Lequinn Sarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Travis Lequinn Sarvis appeals the district court’s

orders reducing his sentence pursuant to the Government’s Fed.

R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion and denying Sarvis’ motion for a

further reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Sarvis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sarvis-ca4-2010.