United States v. Sarr

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Sarr

521 F. App'x 229

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2013·No. No. 13-6246·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ibrahima Sarr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Sarr, No. 2:06-cr-00056-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. filed Jan. 30, 2013; [230] entered Jan. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ibrahima Sarr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Sarr, No. 2:06-cr-00056-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. filed Jan. 30, 2013; [230] entered Jan. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Sarr, 521 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

521 F. App'x 229 (United States v. Sarr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.