United States v. Sarmiento

315 F. App'x 666

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Footnotes

•

**

Julio Perez Sarmiento appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for fraud and misuse of visas and other documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a), and being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

Sarmiento contends that his appeal waiver and waiver of the right to collaterally attack his sentence are invalid. The district court’s plea colloquy confirms that Sarmiento knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to appeal as part of the plea agreement. Accordingly, we enforce the appeal waiver. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 624 (9th Cir.2007).

We remand to the district court with directions to correct the judgment of conviction to exclude the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.