United States v. Sarmiento

23 F. App'x 178
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2002·No. No. 01-7471·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jesus Alberto Sarmiento appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sarmiento, Nos. CR-95-389-AW; CA-01-1860-AW (D.Md. July 12, 2001); see also United States v. McAllister, 272 F.3d 228 (4th Cir.2001) (rejecting challenge to constitutionality of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841 (West 1999 & Supp.2001) in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sarmiento, 23 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2002).

23 F. App'x 178 (United States v. Sarmiento) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Keith Andre McAllister
272 F.3d 228 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)