United States v. Santora
609 F.2d 433
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 26, 1979·No. Nos. 76-3440, 76-3446, 76-3485, 76-3521, 76-3525, 76-3567, 76-3711 and 77-2626·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The opinion heretofore filed, 9 Cir., 600 F.2d 1317, is amended by deleting the following language at page 2573, at the end of the first full paragraph in the right-hand column of the printed slip opinion [600 F.2d at 1322.]:
“Since Cohn’s conversations must be suppressed, his conviction must be reversed for insufficient evidence. Because Cohn cannot be retried (Greene v. Massey (1978) 437 U.S. 19, 98 S.Ct. 2151, 57 L.Ed.2d 15), we need not reach the question whether his right to a speedy trial was violated.”
Footnote 2 is inserted following the words “traffic with Paul Harmon” in the same paragraph.
The text of footnote 2 shall read as follows:
“We have examined Cohn’s speedy trial claim and are satisfied it does not meet the four-part test laid down by the Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo (1972) 407 U.S. 514, 530-33, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101.”
The Government’s petition for rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Santora, 609 F.2d 433 (9th Cir. 1979).
609 F.2d 433 (United States v. Santora) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Knapp
74 F. Supp. 3d 1338 (D. Nevada, 2015)
United States v. Cheely
814 F. Supp. 1430 (D. Alaska, 1992)
United States v. Joseph R. Carneiro, Terry L. Johnson, George L. Ennis, Larry Emerson, Thomas Francis Begley, Willie Williams, Thomas J. Boyd
861 F.2d 1171 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Valdez-Pacheco
701 F. Supp. 775 (D. Oregon, 1988)
State v. Pemberthy
540 A.2d 227 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
United States v. Brone
792 F.2d 1504 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. John A. Walczak
783 F.2d 852 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Dario Dicesare, United States of America v. Kathleen Flannery, United States of America v. Jose Marin
765 F.2d 890 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
United States v. Costello
610 F. Supp. 1450 (N.D. Illinois, 1985)
State v. Thompson
464 A.2d 799 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1983)
United States v. Paul Joseph Harmon
632 F.2d 812 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)