United States v. Santiago

560 F.3d 62
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 560 F.3d 62
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided April 6, 2009·No. 07-1575·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 07-1575

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

JULIO CARRION SANTIAGO,

Defendant, Appellant. ____________________

No. 07-1718

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

PEDRO MIRANDA

Defendant, Appellant. ___________________

No. 07-1728

JUAN NUNEZ,

Defendant, Appellant. ____________________ No. 07-2017

JOSE O. RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on March 19, 2009, should be

amended as follows.

On page 11, replace the last sentence of 1st paragraph which

begins "The objection was not preserved at sentencing . . . ." with

"Although Nunez did at sentencing contest the quantity of drugs

recommended by the pre-sentence report, the base offense level he

requested instead was in fact the one adopted by the district judge,

and reasonably so.".

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Santiago, 560 F.3d 62 (1st Cir. 2009).

560 F.3d 62 (United States v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.