United States v. Santiage Defillo
This text of 277 F.2d 162 (United States v. Santiage Defillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
277 F.2d 162
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Santiage DEFILLO, Appellant.
No. 256, Docket 25950.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued March 11, 1960.
Decided March 17, 1960.
David Klingsberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr., U.S. Atty., and Louis T. Gallo, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for appellee.
Before CLARK, WATERMAN, and LEWIS,1 Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Kaufman, June 30, 1959, 182 F.Supp. 782.
Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 F.2d 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-santiage-defillo-ca2-1960.