United States v. Sandoval-Valencia
This text of 96 F. App'x 458 (United States v. Sandoval-Valencia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Rodolfo Sandoval-Valencia appeals the district court’s imposition of a sixteen-level increase in the range prescribed by the United States Sentencing Guidelines based on his Washington State conviction for third-degree rape. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and we affirm. We see no meaningful distinction between this case and United States v. Pereira-Salmeron-1 Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 F. App'x 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sandoval-valencia-ca9-2004.