United States v. Sandoval
This text of United States v. Sandoval (United States v. Sandoval) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 23-50255 Document: 65-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/01/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 23-50255 FILED March 1, 2024 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Jason Sandoval,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:22-CR-247-2 ______________________________
Before Jones, Smith, and Graves, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Jason Sandoval has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sandoval has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
_____________________ * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 23-50255 Document: 65-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/01/2024
No. 23-50255
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Sandoval, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sandoval-ca5-2024.