United States v. Sandoval
This text of United States v. Sandoval (United States v. Sandoval) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 04-51307 _____________________ F I L E D May 3, 2005 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. HERMILO SANDOVAL Defendant - Appellant
--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (00-CR-1405) ---------------------
Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
IT IS ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to
vacate the sentence is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion
to remand the case to District Court for resentencing in light of
the Supreme Court’s opinion in Booker and this Court’s opinion in
Mares is granted.
__________________ *Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed
alternative motion to extend time to file the Appellee’s brief
fourteen (14) days from the Court’s denial of the Appellee’s
motion to vacate and remand is denied as unnecessary.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Sandoval, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sandoval-ca5-2005.