United States v. Sandoval

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Sandoval. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 F.3d 1385
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 24, 1997·No. 96-20388·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20388 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID BARCENAS SANDOVAL, JR, also known as David B. Sandoval,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-95-256-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Barcenas Sandoval, Jr., filed a notice of appeal from

his sentence in a guilty-plea conviction for possession of

cocaine with intent to distribute. We have reviewed Sandoval’s

brief and the record and conclude that Sandoval’s waiver of his

right to appeal as part of the plea agreement was knowing and

voluntary. See United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567 (5th Cir. 1992). A claim

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-20388 - 2 -

that is waived is "entirely unreviewable, unlike forfeited

errors, which are reviewable for plain error." See United States

v. Musquiz, 45 F.3d 927, 931 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct.

54 (1995). The appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sandoval, (5th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Sandoval (United States v. Sandoval) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Musquiz
45 F.3d 927 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Brian Melancon
972 F.2d 566 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)