United States v. Sandoval
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-20388 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID BARCENAS SANDOVAL, JR, also known as David B. Sandoval,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-95-256-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
David Barcenas Sandoval, Jr., filed a notice of appeal from
his sentence in a guilty-plea conviction for possession of
cocaine with intent to distribute. We have reviewed Sandoval’s
brief and the record and conclude that Sandoval’s waiver of his
right to appeal as part of the plea agreement was knowing and
voluntary. See United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567 (5th Cir. 1992). A claim
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-20388 - 2 -
that is waived is "entirely unreviewable, unlike forfeited
errors, which are reviewable for plain error." See United States
v. Musquiz, 45 F.3d 927, 931 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct.
54 (1995). The appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. See 5th
Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Sandoval (United States v. Sandoval) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.