United States v. Sandoval

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Sandoval

161 F. App'x 891

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 6, 2006·No. No. 05-12147; D.C. Docket No. 04-00032-CR-J-20-MMH·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Roland Falcon, appointed counsel for Adrian Sandoval in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because indepen[892] dent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sandoval’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Roland Falcon, appointed counsel for Adrian Sandoval in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because indepen[892] dent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sandoval’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Sandoval, 161 F. App'x 891 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

161 F. App'x 891 (United States v. Sandoval) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related