United States v. Sanders

13 C.M.A. 322, 13 USCMA 322, 32 C.M.R. 322, 1962 CMA LEXIS 184, 1962 WL 4494
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedSeptember 21, 1962
DocketNo. 16,163
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 C.M.A. 322 (United States v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sanders, 13 C.M.A. 322, 13 USCMA 322, 32 C.M.R. 322, 1962 CMA LEXIS 184, 1962 WL 4494 (cma 1962).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The accused stands convicted of three specifications of larceny, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 10 USC § 921. Although the thefts occurred at substantially the same time and place, the law officer informed the court-martial that they were separately punishable. This was prejudicial error. United States v Florence, 1 USCMA 620, 5 CMR 48; United States v Swigert, 8 USCMA 468, 24 CMR 278.

The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for further reference to the board and appropriate reassessment of the sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ventegeat
20 C.M.A. 32 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)
United States v. Winning
13 C.M.A. 359 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 C.M.A. 322, 13 USCMA 322, 32 C.M.R. 322, 1962 CMA LEXIS 184, 1962 WL 4494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sanders-cma-1962.