United States v. Sanders

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 10, 1998·No. 98-6556·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6556

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEVIN DEWAYNE SANDERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., Dis- trict Judge. (CR-95-179)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Dewayne Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying Appel-

lant’s motion for a reduction of his sentence based on substantial

assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sanders, No. CR-

95-179 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sanders, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Sanders (United States v. Sanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.