United States v. Sanchez-Rodriguez
This text of 31 F. App'x 430 (United States v. Sanchez-Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Onofre Sanchez-Rodriguez appeals his conviction for two counts of drug possession and/or distribution in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Sanchez contends that his convictions pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(A) are unconstitutional because the statute allows a district court to impose a sentence above the statutory maximum on the basis of a drug quantity finding that was not submitted to a jury. This argument is foreclosed by this Court’s recent en banc decision in (United States v. Buckland, 277 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir.2002)) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 F. App'x 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sanchez-rodriguez-ca9-2002.