United States v. Sanchez-Rodriguez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Sanchez-Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 F. App'x 491
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2002·No. 01-40605·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40605 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLEMENTE SANCHEZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-01-CR-55-1 -------------------- February 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Clemente

Sanchez-Rodriguez (Sanchez) on appeal has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sanchez has filed a letter in

response to counsel’s motion in which he moves to proceed pro se

on appeal. Sanchez’s motion to proceed pro se is DENIED. United

States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous appellate issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-40605 -2-

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sanchez-Rodriguez, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Sanchez-Rodriguez (United States v. Sanchez-Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wagner
158 F.3d 901 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)