United States v. Sanchez
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-50642 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALBERT SANCHEZ, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-94-CR-384 - - - - - - - - - - June 3, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Albert Sanchez, Jr., appeals his sentence after being
convicted of distribution of cocaine and possession of cocaine
with intent to distribute. Sanchez contends that the district
court erred in assessing a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G.
§ 3B1.1(c) after determining that he was an organizer in the
offense. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the
parties and hold that the district court’s determination did not
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-50642 - 2 -
have an adequate evidentiary basis. United States v. Jobe, 101
F.3d 1046 (5th Cir. 1996). The record is inadequate to show that
Sanchez supervised Manzano in any activity for which Manzano was
criminally liable. Accordingly, the two-level enhancement under
§ 3B1.1(c) was improper.
It is ordered that the sentence imposed by the district
court against Sanchez is VACATED. The case is REMANDED to the
district court for resentencing.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Sanchez (United States v. Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.