United States v. Sanchez

253 F. App'x 153
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Sanchez. Read the opinion of the Court — 517 F.3d 651
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 8, 2007·No. No. 05-2143-cr·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-appellant appeals from the judgment of conviction in the District Court, following his guilty plea to conspiracy with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He was sentenced principally to a term of 135 months’ incarceration. Defendant-appellant argues that the sentence imposed on him was unreasonable because it is longer than necessary to serve the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case.

We review the imposition of a sentence for procedural and substantive reasonableness. United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103, 114 (2d Cir.2005). We also conclude that the sentenced imposed on defendant-appellant is not unreasonably long.

The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sanchez, 253 F. App'x 153 (2d Cir. 2007).

253 F. App'x 153 (United States v. Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jerome Crosby
397 F.3d 103 (Second Circuit, 2005)