United States v. Samuels
This text of 275 F. App'x 730 (United States v. Samuels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Michael Anthony Samuels appeals from his sentence of 9 months imprisonment and 36 months of supervised release imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Samuels contends that the sentence is unreasonable because the district court judge failed to adequately consider his medical condition and because the sentence may represent half of his remaining life expectancy. We conclude that the district court did not commit any procedural error and that the sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-96 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc); see also United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 n. 5 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 F. App'x 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-samuels-ca9-2008.