United States v. Samuel William Cocke
This text of 325 F. App'x 465 (United States v. Samuel William Cocke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Samuel William Cocke appeals the eighteen-month sentence he received for violating a condition of his supervised release. Despite the fact his sentence is three months below the low end of the range recommended under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a) (21-27 months based on the Grade B violation Cocke admitted to and his Criminal History Category of VI), Cocke argues the district court 2 imposed an unreasonable sentence.
*466 We review the sentence imposed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Charles, 531 F.3d 637, 640 (8th Cir.2008). The record indicates the district court was aware of, and considered, the relevant sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for determining an appropriate sentence for a violation of supervised release. The record also indicates the district court considered Cocke’s arguments for imposing a lower sentence. We see nothing in the record to indicate the district court abused its discretion in imposing a sentence that was already below the recommended Guidelines, and therefore affirm.
. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
325 F. App'x 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-samuel-william-cocke-ca8-2009.