United States v. Samuel Goldstein
This text of 256 F.2d 581 (United States v. Samuel Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
256 F.2d 581
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Samuel GOLDSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 324, Docket 24920.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued April 17, 1958.
Decided April 28, 1958.
Arthur D. Goldstein (of Samuel Goldstein & Sons), New York City, for defendant-appellant.
Nicholas Tsoucalas, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., and John A. Guzzetta, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Ryan, United States v. Pay-O-Matic Corp., 162 F.Supp. 154; and see also United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co., 355 U.S. 587, 78 S.Ct. 442, 2 L.Ed.2d 510.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 F.2d 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-samuel-goldstein-ca2-1958.