United States v. Samuel France

471 F. App'x 497
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Samuel France. Read the opinion of the Court — 394 F. App'x 246
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2012·No. 10-2606·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Darnell France, a federal prisoner, appeals the sentence imposed on remand from this court. France entered a guilty plea in 2008 to a charge of distribution of fifty or more grams of cocaine base. He was classified as a career offender. After receiving a downward departure for substantial assistance, he was sentenced to 200 months’ imprisonment.

On appeal, we vacated France’s sentence and remanded for further development of whether one of his prior convictions was a violent felony for purposes of the career-offender determination. On remand, the government could not establish that the prior conviction was a violent felony. France was therefore resenteneed, after again receiving credit for substantial assistance, to a term of 73 months’ imprisonment.

Now, on appeal from his new sentence, France argues that the district court should have applied the Fair Sentencing Act, because his resentencing occurred after the effective date of that Act. Although the government contested this issue in the district court, it has changed its position and now agrees with France that he should be sentenced under the Fair Sentencing Act. Accordingly, we vacate France’s sentence and remand for resentencing. See United States v. Jones, 443 Fed.Appx. 994, 995 (6th Cir.2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Samuel France, 471 F. App'x 497 (6th Cir. 2012).

471 F. App'x 497 (United States v. Samuel France) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Gevoy Jones
443 F. App'x 994 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)