United States v. Samuel Figueroa

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Samuel Figueroa

456 F.2d 252, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10798

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 13, 1972

Docket71-2971

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 456 F.2d 252 (United States v. Samuel Figueroa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Samuel Figueroa, 456 F.2d 252, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10798 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Figueroa drove his car from Mexico into the United States. A search at the border disclosed 50 kilograms of marihuana concealed in a compartment of the trunk of the car. Figueroa denied knowing that it was there. He now appeals from his smuggling conviction under 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960 and 963. His sole contention is that the evidence was insufficient. Appointed counsel has argued the point fully and ably, but it is without merit. United States v. Asco-lani-Gonzalez, 9 Cir., 1971, 449 F.2d 159. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Figueroa drove his car from Mexico into the United States. A search at the border disclosed 50 kilograms of marihuana concealed in a compartment of the trunk of the car. Figueroa denied knowing that it was there. He now appeals from his smuggling conviction under 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960 and 963. His sole contention is that the evidence was insufficient. Appointed counsel has argued the point fully and ably, but it is without merit. United States v. Asco-lani-Gonzalez, 9 Cir., 1971, 449 F.2d 159. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

456 F.2d 252, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-samuel-figueroa-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack