United States v. Samuel Damiano

290 F.2d 817, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4488
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMay 16, 1961
Docket13505
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 290 F.2d 817 (United States v. Samuel Damiano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Samuel Damiano, 290 F.2d 817, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4488 (3d Cir. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. He does not deny that he possessed and passed counterfeit one hundred dollar bills. He does deny that he knew they were counterfeit. Defendant went to a poker game in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and passed five counterfeit one hundred dollar bills and lent another to a friend of his. He went into the game with these counterfeit bills plus several other hundred dollar bills which he had in his wallet. He came out of the game with the genuine bills but the counterfeit bills were all gone. The jury, under a careful charge by the trial judge, concluded that the defendant did have knowledge of the counterfeit nature of the money by finding him guilty. While the case is not the strongest one in the world, we think that the recited facts plus others in the record were enough to justify the jury coming to that conclusion.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. David Galvin
394 F.2d 228 (Third Circuit, 1968)
United States v. Ward Baking Company
224 F. Supp. 66 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 F.2d 817, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-samuel-damiano-ca3-1961.