United States v. Samuel Castillo-Ramirez
This text of 539 F. App'x 400 (United States v. Samuel Castillo-Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Samuel Adan Castillo-Ramirez raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed *401 by United States v. Newson, 515 F.3d 374, 378-79 (5th Cir.2008), which held that the Government may decline to move for an additional one-point reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b) based on the defendant’s refusal to waive his right to appeal. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *401 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
539 F. App'x 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-samuel-castillo-ramirez-ca5-2013.