United States v. Samuel

1 F. App'x 145
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 2001
Docket00-7067
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 F. App'x 145 (United States v. Samuel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Samuel, 1 F. App'x 145 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darrell W. Samuel seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. * **§United States v. Samuel, No. CR-94-773 (D.S.C. June 1, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

Samuel filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report. He raised specific objections to four of the claims asserted in his § 2255 motion and supplements to the motion. Samuel has waived appellate review of the claims for which no objections were noted. See Crum v. Sullivan, 921 F.2d 642, 645 (6th Cir.1990); Praylow v. Martin, 761 F.2d 179, 181 n. 1 (4th Cir.1985) (party precluded from raising issue on appeal when no objections filed as to that issue).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Samuel
37 F. App'x 619 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F. App'x 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-samuel-ca4-2001.