United States v. Samuel Anthony Cammarata
This text of 721 F.2d 134 (United States v. Samuel Anthony Cammarata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant Cammarata appealed his criminal conviction to this court. Subsequent to his appeal, he died. When a defendant dies pending direct appeal of his criminal conviction, not only the appeal but also all proceedings had in the prosecution from its inception are abated. United States v. Pauline, 625 F.2d 684 (5th Cir. 1980).
The defendant's attorney of record has filed a motion in this court, attached to which is a certified certificate of Cammara-ta’s death, praying for remand to the district court with directions to dismiss the indictment. In accordance with our ruling in Pauline, supra, we grant this motion.
Therefore, it having been made known to this court as a fact, supported by an official death certificate, that the appellant Samuel Anthony Cammarata died in Springfield, Missouri, on October 9, 1983, the motion to remand is granted, the appeal is dismissed as moot, and the case is remanded with directions to the District Court to vacate the judgment and dismiss the superseding indictment in United States v. Cammarata, Docket No. A-81-Cr-112(1), United States District Court, Western District of Texas, Austin Division.
REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
721 F.2d 134, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-samuel-anthony-cammarata-ca5-1983.