United States v. Sampson Williams

28 F. App'x 618
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 2002
Docket01-2970
StatusUnpublished

This text of 28 F. App'x 618 (United States v. Sampson Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sampson Williams, 28 F. App'x 618 (8th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

*619 PER CURIAM.

Sampson Williams appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Western District of Missouri, committing him to the custody of the United States Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 to continue his commitment beyond the expiration of his sentence. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Williams suffers from a mental disease or defect, that as a result his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to another’s property, and that suitable arrangements for State custody and care are not available. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246; United States v. S.A., 129 F.3d 995, 1000 (8th Cir.1997) (standard of review), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1011, 118 S.Ct. 1200, 140 L.Ed.2d 329 (1998). The experts unanimously agreed that Williams was dangerous, and he failed to submit any medical or other expert evidence to the contrary. See United States v. Lewis, 929 F.2d 440, 442 (8th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (§ 4246 findings upheld where supported by unanimous expert opinion, including that of court-appointed independent expert); United States v. Steil, 916 F.2d 485, 488 (8th Cir.1990) (affirming district court’s conclusion that inmate was mentally ill and dangerous under § 4246, because there was no contrary medical opinion in record and at least five mental health professionals had found inmate mentally ill and dangerous).

Accordingly, we affirm and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable James C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jeffrey Allen Steil
916 F.2d 485 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Marlon Joe Lewis
929 F.2d 440 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. S.A.
129 F.3d 995 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Alphonse v. United States
523 U.S. 1011 (Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. App'x 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sampson-williams-ca8-2002.