United States v. Sampson

187 U.S. 436, 23 S. Ct. 216, 47 L. Ed. 248, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1662
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 5, 1903
Docket273
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 187 U.S. 436 (United States v. Sampson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Sampson, 187 U.S. 436, 23 S. Ct. 216, 47 L. Ed. 248, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1662 (1903).

Opinion

The Chief Justice.

This libel in prize was filed by Eear Admiral Sampson in his own behalf and also in behalf of all of the officers and enlisted men of the United States Navy, who took part in the engagement off Santiago de Cuba on July 3, 1898, in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, and went to a decree of condemnation from which this appeal was prosecuted.

On May 19, 1902, the death of Rear Admiral Sampson was suggested by the Attorney General, and a motion made that *437 the cause proceed under its then caption and without the substitution of any other individual as a party, which was postponed to the hearing of thé case on its merits.

That hearing has been had, and counsel, in aid of the court, have made application for the substitution of the adminis-tratrix of Admiral Sampson, and submitted considerations in respect of the substitution also of one or more officers, as, and if, deemed necessary.

We think some one to carry on the proceedings in the interest of all should be substituted, but that it is not necessary that the personal representatives of those who may have deceased should come in, or that any person should ex officio be designated. The matter is merely one of convenience and without significance in itself.

Bear Admiral Evans, Bear Admiral Taylor, Captain French E. Chadwick, and others are represented in the litigation by counsel; but Bear Admiral Schley and others are not. Of those so represented, Bear Admiral Evans is absent on a foreign station, while Bear Admiral Taylor is within the jurisdiction. It seems to us that the substitution of Bear Admiral Taylor will satisfactorily meet the exigency, and it will be

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winters v. American Trust Co.
14 S.W.2d 740 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1929)
The Infanta Maria Teresa
188 U.S. 283 (Supreme Court, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 U.S. 436, 23 S. Ct. 216, 47 L. Ed. 248, 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sampson-scotus-1903.