United States v. Salvatore Cottone

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Salvatore Cottone

54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17540, 1995 WL 295508

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 16, 1995

Docket94-6003

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 774 (United States v. Salvatore Cottone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Salvatore Cottone, 54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17540, 1995 WL 295508 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Salvatore COTTONE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-6003.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 16, 1995.

Salvatore Cottone, Appellant Pro Se.

Justin W. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Cottone, Nos. CR-89-102; CA-93-904-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 3, 1993 and Nov. 29, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny as moot Appellant's motion for a stay. We also deny Appellant's motion for a hearing based on newly discovered evidence

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Salvatore COTTONE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-6003.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 16, 1995.

Salvatore Cottone, Appellant Pro Se.

Justin W. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Cottone, Nos. CR-89-102; CA-93-904-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 3, 1993 and Nov. 29, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny as moot Appellant's motion for a stay. We also deny Appellant's motion for a hearing based on newly discovered evidence

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17540, 1995 WL 295508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-salvatore-cottone-ca4-1995.