United States v. Salinas

135 F. App'x 759
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 23, 2005
Docket04-40777
StatusUnpublished

This text of 135 F. App'x 759 (United States v. Salinas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Salinas, 135 F. App'x 759 (5th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Maria Nicolasa Salinas appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty plea to transporting an illegal alien for private financial gain. Citing United States v. Booker, - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), Salinas argues that the six-level increase she received pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) violated her Sixth Amendment rights. As Salinas did not raise this claim in the district court, our review is for plain error. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517). Salinas’s argument fails to survive review under this standard because she has not shown that any Booker error affected her substantial rights. See id. at 522.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Mares
402 F.3d 511 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 F. App'x 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-salinas-ca5-2005.