United States v. Salgado-Castillo
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Simon Salgado-Castillo appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for unlawful reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Salgado-Castillo has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. SalgadoCastillo has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
61 F. App'x 485 (United States v. Salgado-Castillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.