United States v. Salerno

952 F.2d 624
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 20, 1991·No. Docket Nos. 88-1464, 88-1470 to 88-1474, 88-1477, 88-1547, 90-1291, 90-1292, 90-1296, 90-1297, 90-1301, 90-1311, 90-1312, 90-1351·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

A petition for rehearing containing a suggestion that the action be reheard en banc having been filed herein by appellee, United States of America.

The panel that heard the appeal having denied rehearing by order dated September 24, 1991, 937 F.2d 797, and upon further consideration having amended its opinion by order dated November 6, 1991, 952 F.2d 623, and a poll having been requested and taken subsequent to the entry of the September 24, 1991, order,

It is Hereby Ordered that the final paragraph of the September 24, 1991, order with respect to the suggestion for rehearing en banc is amended to read:

It is further noted that the suggestion for rehearing en banc having been transmitted to the judges of the court in regular active service and at the request of such a judge, a poll of the judges in regular active service having been taken, a majority has voted not to reconsider the matter en banc. Judge Newman dissents from the denial of en banc reconsideration in an opinion concurred in by Judges Kearse, Mahoney and Walker.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Salerno, 952 F.2d 624 (2d Cir. 1991).

952 F.2d 624 (United States v. Salerno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ganadonegro
854 F. Supp. 2d 1088 (D. New Mexico, 2012)
United States v. Mohammad Dolah, Marshall Weinberg
245 F.3d 98 (Second Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Sher Malik Bahadar
954 F.2d 821 (Second Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Salerno
952 F.2d 624 (Second Circuit, 1991)