United States v. Saldua
This text of 120 F. App'x 553 (United States v. Saldua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Moses C. Saldua appeals his guilty-plea convictions for the simultaneous possession of a firearm and ammunition under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), contending the convictions are multiplicitous and violate double jeopardy. The Government does not seek to rely on Saldua’s claimed waiver of appeal; therefore, this court will not enforce it. See United States v. Rhodes, 253 F.3d 800, 804 (5th Cir.2001).
As the Government concedes, simultaneous convictions and sentences for the same criminal act involving possession of a firearm and possession of ammunition violate double jeopardy. United States v. Berry, 977 F.2d 915, 919 (5th Cir.1992). The district court’s ordering Saldua’s sentences to run concurrently does not change this result. Id. at 920; United States v. Kimbrough, 69 F.3d 723, 729 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1157, 116 S.Ct. 1547, 134 L.Ed.2d 650 (1996). Accordingly, we VACATE Saldua’s sentences and REMAND for dismissal of one of the duplicitous convictions, at the election of the Government, and for resentencing.
VACATED AND REMANDED
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 F. App'x 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-saldua-ca5-2005.