United States v. Salazar-Quiroz
Opinion
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eudocio Salazar-Quiroz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and supplemental letter brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Salazar-Quiroz has not filed a response. He has recently been released [411]*411from imprisonment and removed from the United States.
Our independent review of the record and counsel’s briefs discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir.2007).
Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
375 F. App'x 410 (United States v. Salazar-Quiroz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.