United States v. Saenz

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Saenz. Read the opinion of the Court — 286 F. App'x 166
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2009·No. 08-20530·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED August 18, 2009 No. 08-20530 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUADALUPE SAENZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-154-4

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Saenz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Saenz has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Saenz, (5th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Saenz (United States v. Saenz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)