United States v. Saenz

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Saenz

136 F. App'x 661

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2005·No. 04-41341·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Robert S. Saenz on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Saenz has filed a pro se response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Saenz’s pro se response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Robert S. Saenz on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Saenz has filed a pro se response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Saenz’s pro se response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Saenz, 136 F. App'x 661 (5th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

136 F. App'x 661 (United States v. Saenz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related