United States v. Sadler

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 18, 1997·No. 97-6540·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6540

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WALTER LEE SADLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-134-V)

Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 18, 1997

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Lee Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Walter Lee Sadler appeals from the district court's denial of

his "Motion for Discovery of Grand Jury Minutes." Our review re-

veals that Sadler previously moved for production of this same

material, and that this court affirmed the district court's denial

of that prior motion. United States v. Sadler, Nos. 96-7126, 96- 7674 (4th Cir. Jan. 23, 1997) (unpublished). We again find no error

in the district court's denial of relief. We therefore affirm the

district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Sadler, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Sadler (United States v. Sadler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.