United States v. Saddler
This text of 254 F. App'x 527 (United States v. Saddler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Christopher Saddler appeals the district court’s order denying his Motion to Suppress. Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having studied the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in denying the Motion to Suppress. Because the district court fully articulated the reasons for denying the Motion, the *528 issuance of a detailed opinion by this court would be duplicative and would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court upon the reasoning set out by that court in its order dated February 28, 2006, 445 F.Supp.2d 862.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 F. App'x 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-saddler-ca6-2007.