United States v. Ryan Souza
This text of United States v. Ryan Souza (United States v. Ryan Souza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-3438 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Ryan William Souza
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________
Submitted: July 26, 2023 Filed: August 17, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Ryan Souza appeals after he entered a conditional guilty plea to drug and firearm offenses. He argues that the district court1 erred by denying his motion to
1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. suppress and his request for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978).
We conclude that Souza waived his challenge to the denial of a Franks hearing, as he failed to raise in the district court the specific challenges he now makes on appeal. See United States v. Green, 691 F.3d 960, 965 (8th Cir. 2012) (mere filing of motion to suppress is not sufficient to avoid waiver of specific arguments that are advanced for first time on appeal). We also conclude that the district court did not err in denying Souza’s motion to suppress, as the information in the affidavit for the relevant warrant application supported a finding of probable cause. See United States v. Evans, 4 F.4th 633, 636 (8th Cir. 2021) (on appeal of denial of motion to suppress, district court’s findings of fact are reviewed for clear error and its legal conclusions are reviewed de novo); United States v. El-Alamin, 574 F.3d 915, 923 (8th Cir. 2009) (whether affidavit establishes probable cause is determined by issuing judge based on totality of circumstances).
Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ryan Souza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ryan-souza-ca8-2023.