United States v. Ryan Pflug
This text of 85 F. App'x 546 (United States v. Ryan Pflug) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ryan Pflug pleaded guilty to distributing marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The district court 1 sentenced him to 51 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release.
On appeal Pflug’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence was too harsh and that the district court failed to assure that a factual basis existed to support the felon-in-possession charge. These arguments, however, fall within the scope of an appeal waiver contained in Pflug’s plea agreement; Pflug voluntarily and knowingly entered into the plea agreement and the waiver; and enforcement of the waiver will not result in a miscarriage of justice. Accordingly, we enforce the waiver. See United States v. Woods, 346 F.3d 815, 817-18 (8th Cir. 2003).
Having found in our independent review no nonfrivolous issues not covered by the waiver, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw,
. The Honorable Daniel Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 F. App'x 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ryan-pflug-ca8-2004.