United States v. Ryan Little
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6686
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RYAN O’NEIL LITTLE, a/k/a LA, a/k/a Youngblood,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:95-cr-00105-MOC-1)
Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ryan O’Neil Little, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ryan O’Neil Little appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did
not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (stating
standard of review), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. We deny Little’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ryan Little (United States v. Ryan Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.