United States v. Ryan Bonneau

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: September 25, 2012
• Docket: 11-30269
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 25 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 11-30269 12-35298 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:10-cr-00402-MO v. 3:12-cv-00173-MO

RYAN FRANK BONNEAU, MEMORANDUM * Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012 **

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

In Appeal No. 12-35298, Ryan Frank Bonneau’s request for a certificate of

appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). All pending motions in that

case, if any, are denied as moot.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In Appeal No. 11-30269, Bonneau appeals from the district court’s order

denying his motion for return of property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. Because Bonneau’s criminal proceedings have ended, we remand to the

district court to determine what, if any, property Bonneau is entitled to have

returned to him. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g); United States v. Kaczynski, 416 F.3d

971, 974 (9th Cir. 2005).

In Appeal No. 12-35298 the request for a certificate of appealability is

DENIED, and in Appeal No. 11-30269 the district court’s order is VACATED

and the case is REMANDED.

2 11-30269& 12-35298