United States v. Rutledge Slattery
This text of 333 F.2d 844 (United States v. Rutledge Slattery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
333 F.2d 844
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Rutledge SLATTERY.
No. 14807.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued May 21, 1964.
Decided June 23, 1964.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Francis L. Van Dusen, Judge.
Jonathan S. Cohen, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Drew J. T. O'Keefe, U. S. Atty., Sullivan Cistone, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellant.
Rutledge Slattery, Philadelphia, Pa., pro se.
Before KALODNER, GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The District Court's Order for Entry of Judgment will be affirmed, 224 F.Supp. 214.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
333 F.2d 844, 14 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5024, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rutledge-slattery-ca3-1964.