United States v. Ruth B. Hopper

214 F.2d 129, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2664
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1954
Docket11964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 F.2d 129 (United States v. Ruth B. Hopper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ruth B. Hopper, 214 F.2d 129, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2664 (6th Cir. 1954).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties ;

And the Court being of the opinion that the judgments of the District Court included in this consolidated appeal are not erroneous, for the reasons given by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion of July 31, 1952, 122 F.Supp. 181, on appellant’s motion for summary judgment;

It Is Ordered That said judgments be and are now affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Satterwhite v. Bocelato
130 F. Supp. 825 (E.D. North Carolina, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 F.2d 129, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ruth-b-hopper-ca6-1954.