United States v. Ruth B. Hopper

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Ruth B. Hopper

214 F.2d 129, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2664

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 28, 1954·No. 11964·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties ;

And the Court being of the opinion that the judgments of the District Court included in this consolidated appeal are not erroneous, for the reasons given by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion of July 31, 1952, 122 F.Supp. 181, on appellant’s motion for summary judgment;

It Is Ordered That said judgments be and are now affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties ;

And the Court being of the opinion that the judgments of the District Court included in this consolidated appeal are not erroneous, for the reasons given by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion of July 31, 1952, 122 F.Supp. 181, on appellant’s motion for summary judgment;

It Is Ordered That said judgments be and are now affirmed.

United States v. Ruth B. Hopper, 214 F.2d 129, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 2664 (6th Cir. 1954).

Pincite

214 F.2d 129 (United States v. Ruth B. Hopper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related