United States v. Russell Erxleben

535 F. App'x 424
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 15, 2013·No. 13-50484·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

A magistrate judge ordered Russell Allen Erxleben detained pending trial for wire fraud, engaging in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property, and securities fraud. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c). A person ordered detained by a magistrate judge is to seek review in the district court by filing “a motion for revocation or amendment of the order.” 18 U.S.C. § 3145(b); see United States v. Gage, 990 F.2d 625, 1993 WL 117780 at *1 (5th Cir. *425 1993) (unpublished); 5th Cir. R. 47.5.3. Instead of seeking such review, Erxleben moves in this court for revocation of the magistrate judge’s order. We, however, lack jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. See Gage, 990 F.2d at 625. Consequently, Erxleben’s appeal is DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Russell Erxleben, 535 F. App'x 424 (5th Cir. 2013).

535 F. App'x 424 (United States v. Russell Erxleben) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Gage
990 F.2d 625 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)