United States v. Russell Erxleben

535 F. App'x 424
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 15, 2013
Docket13-50484
StatusUnpublished

This text of 535 F. App'x 424 (United States v. Russell Erxleben) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Russell Erxleben, 535 F. App'x 424 (5th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

A magistrate judge ordered Russell Allen Erxleben detained pending trial for wire fraud, engaging in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property, and securities fraud. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c). A person ordered detained by a magistrate judge is to seek review in the district court by filing “a motion for revocation or amendment of the order.” 18 U.S.C. § 3145(b); see United States v. Gage, 990 F.2d 625, 1993 WL 117780 at *1 (5th Cir. *425 1993) (unpublished); 5th Cir. R. 47.5.3. Instead of seeking such review, Erxleben moves in this court for revocation of the magistrate judge’s order. We, however, lack jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. See Gage, 990 F.2d at 625. Consequently, Erxleben’s appeal is DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gage
990 F.2d 625 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
535 F. App'x 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-russell-erxleben-ca5-2013.