United States v. Russell

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Russell

189 F. App'x 932

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJuly 18, 2006

DocketNo. 05-16593

StatusPublished

This text of 189 F. App'x 932 (United States v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Russell, 189 F. App'x 932 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents one issue: whether supervised release standard condition No. 13 delegates a judicial function to the district court’s probation office. We resolved this issue in United, States v. Nash, 438 F.3d 1302, 1306 (11th Cir.2006).¹ “Standard Condition Thirteen ... does not improperly delegate a judicial function to a probation officer....” Id. at 1306.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents one issue: whether supervised release standard condition No. 13 delegates a judicial function to the district court’s probation office. We resolved this issue in United, States v. Nash, 438 F.3d 1302, 1306 (11th Cir.2006).¹ “Standard Condition Thirteen ... does not improperly delegate a judicial function to a probation officer....” Id. at 1306.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 F. App'x 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-russell-ca11-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack