United States v. Russell

189 F. App'x 932
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 18, 2006·No. No. 05-16593·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents one issue: whether supervised release standard condition No. 13 delegates a judicial function to the district court’s probation office. We resolved this issue in United, States v. Nash, 438 F.3d 1302, 1306 (11th Cir.2006).1 “Standard Condition Thirteen ... does not improperly delegate a judicial function to a probation officer....” Id. at 1306.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Russell, 189 F. App'x 932 (11th Cir. 2006).

189 F. App'x 932 (United States v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Gloria Newell Nash
438 F.3d 1302 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)