United States v. Rush

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 9, 1996·No. 95-60727·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60727 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANIEL J. RUSH,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:92-CR88PR-02 - - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Daniel J. Rush (#23183-034) has applied for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this appeal from the denial of his

motion for production of transcripts at Government expense. Rush

has also moved this court for an order requiring production of

the transcripts. There is no pending appeal from Rush’s criminal

conviction and Rush has not filed a post-conviction motion

challenging his conviction or sentence. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f).

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-60727 - 2 -

“[A] federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court

records at government expense to search for possible defects,

merely because of his status as an indigent.” Cowan v. United

States, 445 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1971). The motion for leave to

proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is

DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motion for production of

transcripts at Government expense is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rush, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Rush (United States v. Rush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reporters
28 U.S.C. § 753(f)