United States v. Rush
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-60727 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANIEL J. RUSH,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:92-CR88PR-02 - - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Daniel J. Rush (#23183-034) has applied for leave to proceed
in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this appeal from the denial of his
motion for production of transcripts at Government expense. Rush
has also moved this court for an order requiring production of
the transcripts. There is no pending appeal from Rush’s criminal
conviction and Rush has not filed a post-conviction motion
challenging his conviction or sentence. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-60727 - 2 -
“[A] federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court
records at government expense to search for possible defects,
merely because of his status as an indigent.” Cowan v. United
States, 445 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1971). The motion for leave to
proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is
DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motion for production of
transcripts at Government expense is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Rush (United States v. Rush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.