United States v. Rufino Peralta-Sanchez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rufino Peralta-Sanchez. Read the opinion of the Court — 847 F.3d 1124
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 22, 2017·No. 14-50393·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 14-50393 Plaintiff-Appellee, 14-50394

v. D.C. Nos. 3:12-cr-03370-LAB-1 RUFINO PERALTA-SANCHEZ, 3:14-cr-01308-LAB-1 Defendant-Appellant. ORDER

Filed August 22, 2017

Before: Harry Pregerson, Jay S. Bybee, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing is hereby GRANTED.

The opinion and dissent filed February 7, 2017, Nos. 14- 50393 and 14-50394, and appearing at 847 F.3d 1124, are withdrawn. It shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

A memorandum disposition is being simultaneously filed with this order. Judge Pregerson concurs in the judgment. 2 UNITED STATES V. PERALTA-SANCHEZ

No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rufino Peralta-Sanchez, (9th Cir. 2017).

United States v. Rufino Peralta-Sanchez (United States v. Rufino Peralta-Sanchez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rufino Peralta-Sanchez
847 F.3d 1124 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)